Is 1320 Nitro Drag Racing a Realistic Goal?

Is 1320 Nitro Drag Racing a Realistic Goal?

Every year the subject comes up, gets talked about for a time and then fades away. The subject is quarter-mile drag racing and whether it can be brought back for Top Fuel and Funny Car in NHRA Mello Yello competition.

NHRA decided to implement a 1,000-foot track for the nitro-fueled dragsters and floppers scant weeks after Scott Kalitta died at Englishtown in June of 2008. It was a horrid crash at the top end that claimed Kalitta’s life, as he careened past the timing beams with his engine afire, unable to activate his parachutes and, therefore, unable to stop.

Kalitta went through the shutoff area, into and through the kitty litter and over a wall into television equipment. The accident generated more than 100Gs and up to 200Gs, according to Delphi accelerometers. It broke his father Connie Kalitta’s heart and set NHRA on course for a variety of moves, even more than its chassis changes after Eric Medlen’s crash and death in 2007.

There have been huge accidents since the 1,000-foot distance went into play in NHRA drag racing, but racing is dangerous and anyone behind the wheel knows that. Now, according to casual talk by announcers during last weekend’s New England NHRA Nationals race at Epping, NH, the series is considering a return to 1/4-mile racing. Even the communications department has confirmed the subject’s been raised at corporate headquarters in Glendora, Calif.

Is 1320 Nitro Drag Racing a Realistic Goal?
Scott Kalitta

The change could only be effective at some of the tracks where NHRA races, because the added shutdown area isn’t attainable at many dragstrips, including NHRA’s ancestral home of Pomona, Calif. There’s also the matter of containing speeds, which had been approaching 340mph for Funny Car racing before NHRA put a kibosh to laid-back headers.

Then there are tires: Goodyear would have to make changes to their spec tire for both nitro classes. And cost – the amount of setup changes to both engines and chassis would be phenomenal – in a time when fewer than 16 racers show up for many of NHRA’s Mello Yello series’ 24 contests.

The Professional Racers Owners organization (PRO) sided with NHRA when it was decided, just days after Scott Kalitta’s death, to change track distance from 1,320 to 1,000 feet. Team owners and drivers continue to support the shorter length as it saves them money in broken parts and enhances competition with many more side-by-side contests.

So the question remains: would a 1,320 distance be good for the racing or would it shorten fields even farther than what we’ve seen in 2019? Even if used only at a very few tracks, the cost would be prohibitive and the tuning challenges monumental.

If added sponsors come onboard to NHRA racing and if stakeholders agree, some tracks might be able to handle this change. It would please the nostalgia fans, of course. But would it be good for business? NHRA should think long and hard before it capriciously makes this type of change. What’s worked well for more than 10 years shouldn’t be discarded unless and until there’s a consensus in the nitro pits.

Is 1320 Nitro Drag Racing a Realistic Goal?

Avatar
About Anne Proffit 560 Articles
Anne Proffit traces her love of racing - in particular drag racing - to her childhood days in Philadelphia, where Atco Dragway, Englishtown and Maple Grove Raceway were destinations just made for her. As a diversion, she was the first editor of IMSA’s Arrow newsletter, and now writes about and photographs sports cars, Indy cars, Formula 1, MotoGP, NASCAR, Formula Drift, Red Bull Global Rallycross - in addition to her first love of NHRA drag racing. A specialty is a particular admiration for the people that build and tune drag racing engines.

4 Comments on Is 1320 Nitro Drag Racing a Realistic Goal?

  1. Why not introduce a new catagory that would suit both parties. The traditional distance has always been a strip one quarter of a mile long. The current shorter distance is showing timing differences of thousands of a second, a far cry from times in the ealy days when fans could relate to the time differences shown on the timer.have a track that is a true quarter mile and only allow the wngine to run and power the car for half the distance. ie have an electronic engine cutout at the halfway mark. Then the car has to roll to the traps to establish a time. This would put a new emphasis on not only acceleration but also streamlining and drag reduction. Interesting thought

  2. For cost containment and safety I propose the single bullet rule. You get one long block for the meet, and if you blow that one up your race is over. That eliminates heavily funded teams throwing multiple engines at a car to make the line after an engine explosion, and running ragged edge tunes to make the most power. To keep the race going bring back the break rule, if the winner of a round can’t make the line, the loser takes his or her place, so if you run slower but survive and your competitor doesn’t, it doesn’t matter who got to the line first. To finish first you have to be able to run the next round with the same engine you started qualifications with.

  3. Top fuel racing is a joke as it stands. At $60,000. a pass it goes against everything NHRA was all about when it began.

  4. I was born in 1962 in So. Cal. I loved by Lyons. There were of lots of tracks around. Drag racing was in it’s renaissance from the mid 60’s to late 70’s. It was affordable to most folks either participating or watching. Great family fun. Costs have gotten stupid high for the racers which at the end of the day alienates fans because only the deep pockets can afford to race. Don’t even get me going about all the rule changes. I haven’t been an active NHRA fan for over 20 years, since the name change Big Pocket Racing Association.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


I agree to receive emails from RacingJunk.com. I understand that I can unsubscribe at any time. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005-2020 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands
All Rights Reserved.

Internet Brands