347 Stroker Advice - need more low end Torque !

Old 06-14-2012, 02:12 PM
  #1  
ilikecobras
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3
Default 347 Stroker Advice - need more low end Torque !

Hi folks, sure could use some advice and I came here due to the reputation of racingjunk - if I can't fix this, I may be bringing a car to Monroe!

Engine is in a FFR Mark3 Roadster (cobra replica) so very light car. 5000miles on it, I just bought it and it will scream like every guys dream! Problem for me, I like to lug cars and have good drive-ability along with a good lumpy idle and for this car, I can live with a little less performance - yes I said it ops:

So, I'm sure the carb needs some cleaning and a good tune as it's not been driven much lately. It starts, runs, idles great but does smell rich at idle. It feels dead below 2000rpm then it pulls like a horse to 6000 rev limiter. And in my 4tanks I'm getting 10-11mpg (don't like that) and that's just around town no real racing stuff. One local shop suggested starting w/ tuning the carb on their dyno. I tend to think it's either over carb'd or the cam is too hot for my needs. And if I want better gas mileage and more low end torque and drive-ability, maybe I need a different intake (this one for high end), cam swap, a carb swap (vacuum sec or single pumper) or maybe a new, milder engine (god I hope not). I love the car, just need a more torquey engine.

Advice Appreciated:

It's a Ford, 3.73 Rear, T5 Super Duty Trans by Levy Racing 0.8 final ratio.

+Engine Details

+Built by the now infamous T&L back in '08
+Dart Pro 1 Heads (2.02/1.60)
+Compression: 10.06:1
+Intake: Edelbrock Performer RPM Air-Gap (moves powerband up 1000rpm!)
+Carb: AED Holley 650 Double Pumper HO Series
+Cam - Comp 35-000-8 Custom Grind: FW3632F / FW3613F, C/Line 104deg - Intake: Duration @.050 224, Gross Lift 556, Lobe lift .3480 and Exhaust: .513, .230 and .3210 and lobe separation 108.0. My spec sheet has lots more info that I don't understand....

The dyno (corrected) starts at 3300 with 433 (lb-ft) / 272HP, 4000rpm is 421/321, 4500rpm is 428/367, 5000rpm is 433/412 and 5800rpm is 400/441.
ilikecobras is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 03:02 PM
  #2  
TheYellaBrick
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
TheYellaBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Emmett, Idaho
Posts: 7,334
Default

It's definitely built for higher r's.

questions;

Engine - Chevy / Ford / Mopar / Rambler / Studebaker ? :P

Rear end ratio -

Transmission -
TheYellaBrick is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 05:02 PM
  #3  
ilikecobras
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3
Default

added the details - final ratio, etc. to 1st post.
ilikecobras is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 07:41 PM
  #4  
zipper06
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Default

You could gain a little bit of torque on the bottom end by degreeing the cam in at 100 or 102, also changing the Carb to a vacuum secondary 650 carb. Bring it on to Monroe/Twin Cities. Lot's of Ford lovers/people there.

JMO

Zip.
zipper06 is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 08:57 PM
  #5  
hotrod1994
Senior Member
EXPERT BUILDER
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: nekoosa wisconsin
Posts: 308
Default

BUILD A SBC CHEVY
im with zip degree the cam would help some and a higher gear would help it out of the hole a 4.30 with the 5 speed maybe more depending on the tire height
hotrod1994 is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 05:27 AM
  #6  
ilikecobras
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for some of the input. I'm going to tune on the Holley a bit and see what that does then go from there. I'm a long time chevy guy but this is a Cobra so not putting a GM motor in it ... just one of those things like for resale, etc. And maybe I'm at the wrong forum... I do not want a race car, out of the hole perf. is NOT what I want so 4.10 gears etc. not in the plan. I want a more Streetable combo. and equal or less revs at street speed. I'll get there.

What's the thought around the benefit of the vac. sec. 650 vs my double pumper? I've read that but some say on a car this light (2200lb) that vac. isn't' the way to go.
ilikecobras is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 05:31 AM
  #7  
zipper06
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Default

What's the thought around the benefit of the vac. sec. 650 vs my double pumper? I've read that but some say on a car this light (2200lb) that vac. isn't' the way to go.

It will reduce the stumble when you first hit the pedal and will come in a little slower than a double pumper.

JMO

Zip.
zipper06 is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 06:01 AM
  #8  
bjuice
Administrator
RACING JUNKIE
 
bjuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville s.c.
Posts: 3,239
Default

I agree with ZIP on his comments on the Carb. But I think your real problem lies in your cam and intake if Not carb alone...the gearing ratio along with the final tranny ratio is not your problem..IMO..I run a 3.08 gear in a richmond 6 speed tranny with similiar final tranny ratio similiar as your's and I do not have the problems you are having on bottom end, stumble etc...

I know you gave your cam specs above....If I were you before I went changing cams,intakes etc....I would double check this cam you have and have someone ( if not yourself) Qualified to degree the cam in. I ran across a deal like this a few years ago with a friend of mine with a car he bought with a 383ci...the car was just Lazy and would stumble, no matter what...come to find out someone just stuck the camshaft in and paid no regard to even lining up the Dots..HORRIBLE....I forgot how much it was retarded but we degreed the cam in properly and the thing ran like a new car.
No more stumble, plenty of bottom end, mid range and top end, better gas mileage...you name it..

#1- Rebuilding the carb is a great idea for starters...

#2 take your timing light and bring up the rpm's by hand controlling your carb and just see how your timing mark reacts...I have seen small parts broken in top part of distributers even a tooth broken off on the distributer gear...this would cause your timing mark to be jump around erractic sometime advancing and/or retaring your engine timing which could cause you some issues...again this is cheap to check....just a timing light.
#3- check you current cam position

This is where I would start if I were you...tweaking and checking your own set up before changing anything..and if you get to changing things do it one thing at a time so you know what the problem was when you come across it.


hope some of this helps

jmo
__________________
Bjuice..

"I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY ! "
bjuice is offline  
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service