surprise, surprise, SURPRISE !

Old 03-01-2012, 06:32 PM
Senior Member
Thread Starter
TheYellaBrick's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Emmett, Idaho
Posts: 7,334
Default surprise, surprise, SURPRISE !

TheYellaBrick is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 04:57 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: falkville al
Posts: 1,766

i wonder what would happen if they could without doubt prove that he is lying. i do question his birth place myself.
outlaw256 is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 06:40 AM
Senior Member
oldandtired's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sugar Hill, GA
Posts: 1,370

The interesting part:

" Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961. "
oldandtired is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:57 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Concord, Va
Posts: 201

Can't remember if I posted this on here before or not. If I have then pardon my CRS but it's a good read anyway!

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Subject: Good Detective Work on Obama's "birth" certificate?

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes'. So how can the Obama birth certificate state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is age 25 years old and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".

3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Why hasn't any this been discussed in the major media?????

Resources: Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
ken0069 is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 09:11 AM
Harbone's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,998

That coming from Joe Arpio, whom himself is under the microscope right
now, sorry its all BS to me...


As close to "Normal" as I can get...
Harbone is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service