Ignition timing - Gasoline vs Methanol

Old 05-04-2009, 02:59 PM
  #1  
lastfbody
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8
Default Ignition timing - Gasoline vs Methanol

Is there a different ignition timing requirement for methanol as compared to gasoline (for drag racing)? If so, do these differences change according to engine size, i.e. 350 versus 598 CID?

Thanks
lastfbody is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:36 PM
  #2  
hammertime
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Coldwater, MI
Posts: 2,998
Default

Timing does change for bigger ci stuff, my gas carb actually runs at less timing them my alky. But when I ran small blocks the alky was 7-8 degrees less on alky.
hammertime is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:21 PM
  #3  
dparker
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hobbs, NM
Posts: 842
Default

Originally Posted by hammertime
Timing does change for bigger ci stuff, my gas carb actually runs at less timing them my alky. But when I ran small blocks the alky was 7-8 degrees less on alky.
What are you running on timing now?
dparker is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:41 PM
  #4  
I972Nova
Senior Member
EXPERT BUILDER
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orient, OH
Posts: 384
Default

I think it said 35 degrees on the dyno sheet he has posted...
I972Nova is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 06:11 AM
  #5  
hammertime
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Coldwater, MI
Posts: 2,998
Default

Originally Posted by DragsterJosh
I think it said 35 degrees on the dyno sheet he has posted...
correct 35 degrees
hammertime is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:03 AM
  #6  
dparker
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hobbs, NM
Posts: 842
Default

I'm running 35 now but was thinking about running 38,39 degrees. Mines just a 535 though.
dparker is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 08:12 AM
  #7  
hammertime
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Coldwater, MI
Posts: 2,998
Default

I've yet to try and lower mine any, I was happy on the dyno so I didnt mess with it. Ran it there last year also. You may try going a few and see what it does.

I remember my 468 a few years back @ 39 degrees ran 8.40's, I decided to go 33 with it ran 8.20's. Slapped a different intake on it and moved it to 32 and it ran 8.0's, not to shabby for $1500 short block, in a 2010lb car
hammertime is offline  
Old 05-05-2009, 02:12 PM
  #8  
zipper06
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Default

Originally Posted by hammertime
I've yet to try and lower mine any, I was happy on the dyno so I didnt mess with it. Ran it there last year also. You may try going a few and see what it does.

I remember my 468 a few years back @ 39 degrees ran 8.40's, I decided to go 33 with it ran 8.20's. Slapped a different intake on it and moved it to 32 and it ran 8.0's, not to shabby for $1500 short block, in a 2010lb car
Hehe that's funny David,

Think about it, 10's of thousands of dollars spent on motors, a new chassis 100 lbs lighter, and a gain of 1/2 second over the cheapo 468. The reason i think this is funny, is the cheapo 468 i built for the 3700lb Biscyne, stock steel crank, 804 rods, and a set of $425.00 probe 10.2 comp. ratio on pump gas, actual cost was less than $1,000.00 short blk. it's running 10.50's @ 126mph on DOT Hooser street slicks, no one believes it's a 468, there's been estimates from 502 to 540", but we just grin and go on with it :lol:

Zip.
zipper06 is offline  
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service