Changing cam and convertor, what ya think?

Old 10-18-2007, 07:06 PM
  #1  
poboyracin
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 15
Default Changing cam and convertor, what ya think?

Hi all,

Changing the cam and convertor in my car. Here's a rundown on the combo. '69 Chevelle, pump gas, street/strip.

385cid 10.3:1CR 4.040 X 3.750
Brodix IK 200cc 2.02/1.60
Performer RPM Air-Gap Holley 750
Erson 278 solid roller 278/286 238/246 .555/.555 108/104
1.6 in/1.5 ex roller rockers
th 350 3000 stall 4.10 gear 27" tire
3500lbs w/driver

New cam
286/296 256/262 .549/.543 106/102 Solid FT Dynamic CR 8.2:1

Going to put in a 4000 stall. Cam is supposed to pull 3200-6900.

Biggest thing is whether or not that cam will work decently. Intake may get changed to a Vic Jr but so say, the Air Gap isn't giving away much to the single plane.

What's your thoughts?
poboyracin is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 09:56 PM
  #2  
cepx111
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,044
Default

The new cam should work well, not sure how much of a difference it will make as both cams are very similar. The biggest improvement you'll notice will be from the higher stall converter.
Changing the intake to a single plane like the victor jr will help upper rpm horsepower a bunch over the dual plane, but it will kill some torque down low. If you go the single plane route I'd go with alittle more gearing, something like a 456 or 488 would be a killer choice for a heavy car like yours and coupled to a single plane intake, you would notice a profound difference in acceleration, however down side is that it would be wound up all the time on the street. I know your limited to camming due to your lower compression for pump gas and streetabilty but bumping it up to about 11 to 1 or 12 to 1 would really wake up your car espcially with a more agressive cam. You have some killer heads already, just missing a couple keys ingredients for a monster engine. I.E< compression, cam.
I know your caught between a rock and a hard place wanting streetablity, and not wanting to get into the expense of having to buy race fuels and then wanting it to be fast at the track too. I know the feeling.
Sorry for writing a book here, first post of the night for me and I'm killing time here at work so there you go. I seen you hadn't had any replies yet so I chimed in.
Goodluck with your new combo, Charles
cepx111 is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 11:22 PM
  #3  
poboyracin
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 15
Default

The cam change is what I'm debating. I'd be going from a mild solid roller to an aggressive solid FT. The solid roller is 238 @ .050" and the solid FT is 256 @ .050" but how much of a gain is really there when you add in the area under the curve? Lift values are close.
poboyracin is offline  
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service