Isky cam for BBC

Old 05-17-2007, 05:43 PM
  #1  
longrodsbc
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Default Isky cam for BBC

Hey, will this cam work ok with a 11.5:1 496?



http://www.iskycams.com/timingchart...._number=396277


The heads are Factory Oval ports, Ported, 2.25x1.88

The Intake is a Weiand Team G

2 1/8 long tubes

ATI 3600-3800 stall

4.10 rear gear with 28" tall tires

No carb yet,

Just worried this will be to much cam..


Thoughts?


thanks, longrodsbc
longrodsbc is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 06:16 PM
  #2  
topsportsman1
Administrator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maine,USA
Posts: 1,208
Default

Is this going to be a drag race engine? Or is this a duel purpose?

I'm going to say that cam would have a hard time to run a SBC, JMHO
__________________
There Is 1 Thing Better Than Cubic Inches,,,More Of Them
topsportsman1 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 06:23 PM
  #3  
slowman
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: mich
Posts: 208
Default

what are you useing the engine for?
slowman is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 07:31 AM
  #4  
longrodsbc
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Default

Bracket Racing Mostly, I will drive the car once in a while on the street but my main focus is racing.


The car is a 72 Chevelle so Im quessing the weight is 3600?

longrodsbc
longrodsbc is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 07:48 AM
  #5  
topsportsman1
Administrator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maine,USA
Posts: 1,208
Default

I still stand behind what I said,in my last statement,

That is a single pattern camshaft,I wouldn't use it myself,there are alot better special grind camshafts out there,this is one of your "off the shelf camshafts" I go with a special grind cam.

The duration on the cam looks somewhat close,but the lift is a bit away from what that 3600 lb car needs JMHO

Also I'd go with a duel pattern type grind camshaft if it were me :idea:

You can get better
__________________
There Is 1 Thing Better Than Cubic Inches,,,More Of Them
topsportsman1 is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 09:38 AM
  #6  
longrodsbc
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Default

I agree, but I have the cam new in the box, and a new set of Howards direct lube lifters, Id hate to spend more money on a new cam if this cam will work ok, Has anyone ran this cam?

I dont want a snail, so Im open to suggestions..



thanks, longrodsbc
longrodsbc is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 04:17 PM
  #7  
maxpower671
Senior Member
SENIOR BUILDER
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 117
Default

yes, it will work fine
maxpower671 is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 04:22 PM
  #8  
rtpaske
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
Default

It should work, although i'd recommend going with a roller cam vs a solid lifter cam.

I ran a roller cam that was bigger than that (.710i/680e, 278/276 duration @.050 lift) in a 488 ci bbc for several years with some ported iron rectangular port heads and it worked just fine. Was able to run a consistant 9.80 in a 3300 lb car.
rtpaske is offline  
Old 05-19-2007, 03:13 PM
  #9  
edvancedengines
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: VA Hospital, Dallas, Tx (214 302 1924) cell-972-464-7400
Posts: 540
Default

Well,
I am going to have to disagree with my buddy Tom a little bit here.

It should work Ok but you will not have much vacuum if you have power brakes. Your bottom end accelleration will suck and throttle response at low speeds will suck.

I think that with a clutch and a 4 speed it would work a lot better than with an automatic.

To my way of thinking the lift is too low for the duration it is showing. Also did you notice that the gross lift is with rockers of 1.75? I think that it would really like some 1.90 rockers on the intake but those would have to be special made.

Did you notice the cam is recommended for DRAG, not street. That is becuase of the huge overlap.

With the large duration on the short LSA and the huge overlap it will lope like an old John Dear Tractor. That thing will probably still be loping while driving down the street below 3,500 rpm.

Like I said. I think it will work but will be a bear to drive unless you have low gears, big convertor.

I also doubt that your 1972 Chevelle will be weighing as low as 3,600 lbs. Those things only get lighter when they are gutted.

Will it work? - Yes.
Are there much better cams for it? - Tons.
Would I use it if I had to? - Yes. By installing it very advanced.

Will it work in a low compression engine for street driving - NO.
Will it work in a high compression engine for street driving ? - Much better.

Does it cost mure to replace it or use it? - More to use it.

Note;
The previous that is written is only the opinion of one man.

Ed
edvancedengines is offline  
Old 05-19-2007, 03:51 PM
  #10  
slowman
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: mich
Posts: 208
Default

3,600 lbs. Those things only get lighter when they are gutted.

Will it work? - Yes.
Are there much better cams for it? - Tons.
Would I use it if I had to? - Yes. By installing it very advanced.

Will it work in a low compression engine for street driving - NO.
Will it work in a high compression engine for street driving ? - Much better.

Does it cost mure to replace it or use it? - More to use it.

Note;
The previous that is written is only the opinion of one man.

Ed[/quote]opinion of two men i have to agree with ed. i would advance the cam time by 4degrees aleast to give you any bottom end.
slowman is offline  

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service