{"id":25294,"date":"2016-03-18T15:40:34","date_gmt":"2016-03-18T22:40:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/?p=25294"},"modified":"2016-03-18T18:03:10","modified_gmt":"2016-03-19T01:03:10","slug":"congress-working-to-overturn-epa-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/congress-working-to-overturn-epa-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress Working to Overturn EPA Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\":<\/a>
If the EPA rulemaking stands and becomes law, the car on the left, the Mustang, would technically be illegal to build once the law takes effect in 2018. The Riviera on the right is legal as it was manufactured prior to the early 80s.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

All images courtesy NHRA.com<\/strong><\/p>\n

It was announced recently that the EPA had introduced regulations that would effectively eliminate our ability to build race cars. However, contrary to popular belief, this wasn\u2019t new rulemaking as many would lead you to believe. On the contrary, it was actually clarification of rulemaking contained in the Clean Air Act that specifies that tampering with a road vehicle\u2019s emissions systems is illegal. So, in other words, if you drive your emissions-control-equipped car to and from the track (and\/or car shows) and have removed the mandatory emissions controls, it is technically illegal.<\/p>\n

\"fri02\"<\/a>
Another example of a car that neither the EPA rulemaking or the Congressional legislation to overturn it would have an effect on because it was produced prior to emissions controls.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Those of us in the automotive industry already knew this. This has been the case ever since these emissions controls were mandated many years ago. Even more, the rule\/law isn\u2019t set to go into effect until 2018 and there is no language in it that would make it retroactive. This means that even if it stays in place, the cars you\u2019ve got are safe.<\/p>\n

However, this new interpretation of the rule raised a lot of hackles, causing a hew and cry. Automotive aftermarket industry lobbyists got moving and convinced Congress to introduce legislation that would clarify things, ensuring that we are able to continue without hobby without worry of running afoul of the law.<\/p>\n

EPA Says Ruling Is Aimed at Modified Cars Used on Public Roads and Highways<\/p>\n

\"If<\/a>
If either of these cars were to be driven on public roads and their emissions controls have been \u201ctampered with,\u201d they\u2019d both be illegal, even prior to the EPA rulemaking taking effect as they were produced after the early 80s and are not exclusively built for racing.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

It\u2019s always been assumed by those of us in the automotive aftermarket community that these emissions laws only pertained to cars that were used on roads and highways, not cars built exclusively for racing. This can be seen if you visit a site like Edlebrock. There are quite a number of parts that you can buy from these companies that are clearly labeled \u201cNot for use on street vehicles: or similar wording.<\/p>\n

Not long after the news of the ruling became public this year, the EPA made efforts to inform us that we don\u2019t have anything to worry about if our modified production cars weren\u2019t used on public roads. EPA spokeswoman Laura Allen sent out a notice that clarified this stance: \u201cThis clarification does not affect EPA\u2019s enforcement authority. It is still illegal to tamper with or defeat the emission control systems of motor vehicles. In the course of selecting cases for enforcement, the EPA has and will continue to consider whether the tampered vehicle is used exclusively for competition. The EPA remains primarily concerned with cases where the tampered vehicle is used on public roads, and more specifically with automotive aftermarket manufacturers who sell devices that defeat emissions control systems on vehicles used on public roads.\u201d (My emphasis added.) If you trailer your vehicle to and from the track, you have nothing to worry about.
\nCongress Takes Action to Protect Race Car Conversions<\/p>\n

Not long after this news hit the wires, SEMA lobbyists submitted model legislation to both houses of Congress to ensure that we\u2019re able to enjoy our hobby and sport in the future. SEMA called this legislation \u201cThe Recognizing the Protection of Motorsports Act of 2016\u201d,\u201d the RPM Act. Recognizing that this EPA ruling could have a seriously negative impact on a more than $36 billion industry, some members of Congress signed on and introduced legislation in both the House and the Senate. North Carolina\u2019s Representative Patrick McHenry introduced House Resolution 4715, while the same state\u2019s Senator Richard Burr introduced S. 2659.<\/p>\n

\"All<\/a>
All of the cars in this image are exempt no matter what since they are also pre-80s vehicles that were not equipped with emissions controls.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In a nutshell, both bills state that the EPA does not have the authority to \u201cregulate vehicles that are used exclusively competition, and other uses.\u201d The RPM Act modifies the language of 42 U.S.C. 7522 by adding the following text at the end of subsection (a):<\/p>\n

\u201cNo action with respect to any device or element of design described in paragraph (3) shall be treated as a prohibited act under that paragraph if the action is for the purpose of modifying a motor vehicle to be used solely for competition.\u201d<\/p>\n

Further, both bills would modify Section 216 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7550) would be amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and adding the following language:<\/p>\n

\u201cand that is not a vehicle used solely for competition, including any vehicle so used that was converted from a motor vehicle.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"If<\/a>
If this car\u2019s owner drives it to the track, even the new Congressional legislation wouldn\u2019t protect the owner.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Automotive enthusiasts around the country should contact their members of Congress and show their support for both of these pieces of legislation to ensure that we\u2019re able to continue enjoying our hobby and sport in perpetuity. Members of the House of Representatives can be found by heading of the House webpage, while contact information for your senators can be found by visiting the Senate\u2019s webpage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Congress Works to Overturn EPA\u2019s Anti-Racing Ruling<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":25299,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3470],"tags":[4212,2,4056,4043,7],"class_list":["post-25294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-clean-air-act","tag-drag-racing","tag-drag-racing-news","tag-epa","tag-nhra"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/fri03-e1458340802774.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p42YSK-6zY","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25294"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25294\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25961,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25294\/revisions\/25961"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racingjunk.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}