Man vs Machine: Or How Jalopnik Crashed the New Camaro Prototype

When we first hear about Jalopnik’s Patrick George taking the new 6th Gen 2016 Camaro into a wall while testing it at the launch at Belle Island Grand Prix Circuit outside of Detroit, MI (and confirmed that he and his passenger were fine) we admit, we smelled blood in the water.  A journalist taking out a car is both every auto writer’s worst nightmare, and dream come true (assuming no one is hurt). There’s a vicious instinct to laugh, to taunt, to lay blame on poor skills, poor performance, or on the car itself.  To decry the crash as an act of hubris. That it could never happen to me! I declared, in fact, my willingness to feel bad for him and still throw him to the wolves. But then I watched the video.

Here’s the thing – yes, it seems like George took the car out of the corner too hot and hit the wall. He admits his mistake, immediately. You can see him walking back in his head, reviewing the speed of the corner, his familiarity with the vehicle, the millisecond decision that made the difference between cornering effectively and crashing. He is genuinely, deeply contrite. He’s horrified, and he’s sorry, and he knows that there are likely repercussions coming from GM.  They asked him to leave the test. His professional life is probably going to suck for awhile.

But I need to reiterate that all of the above really is an auto journalist’s nightmare. Because crashing and walking away humiliated is one thing, but every crash carries a bigger risk.  Not walking away.  We all know, or know of, journalists killed during tests or out on the road.  They’re usually great drivers, even former racers. And they are generally doing things they’ve done hundreds of times, driving aggressively, but safely. Making small mistakes with big consequences.  The job is a legitimate thrill, a lifelong dream for many auto writers, but the risk is part of the reward. You push the car to see how it functions, to see if its fun, if it’s stable, if you’re going to love it, hate it, find it dull, and you do so in order to report back to consumers, fans, enthusiasts. The people you represent.  No one wants to risk life or or limb to talk about a sweet V8 (or in this case V6), no matter the thrill.  Finding the line between pushing and crashing is a very real part of the job.

George learned a valuable lesson that is more relevant to the daily driver than the power of that V6 engine, and while GM is undoubtedly unhappy, no one was hurt. Many drivers learn similar lessons every day. A car is a machine, an unpredictable, multi-ton machine that is dependent not only on driver skill and accountability to function well, but also on engineering, weather conditions, road conditions, tire conditions, and unseen hazards. There are so  many things that can go wrong in a given moment.

So, let’s give George a little bit of a break. He made a small mistake, with big consequences for the vehicle. And he’s a good reminder that even the best drivers among us are at the mercy of physics, mechanics, and walls that come out of nowhere.

About Andreanna Ditton 89 Articles
Andreanna Ditton is the Content Manager for MotorHead Media and the Editor-in-Chief for RacingJunk.com/news. She's been working in the automotive publishing industry since 2007 focusing on racing and performance for motorcycles and cars.
  • John Krena

    “Small mistake”?? Really? Sorry honey, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…..except your buddy’s a SQUID. Trying too hard to impress; finds the limits of his true driving skills. That’s reality, but your dramatic article was……ummmm….about on par w his driving expertise.

  • Don’tTreadonUs

    Poor Patty 🙁
    Ouch! If I were him I’d just go into hiding for oh say 10-20 years.

    • Nodough

      Suggest he drive for Ford.

  • Cobranut

    This guy must have ZERO driving experience.
    When experiencing under-steer, blindly cranking in more steering angle is precisely the WRONG thing to do.

  • Bill Viverette

    Yeah, so anyone that thinks this could not happen to them is, well, a mousy driver.

  • Marshall Weaver

    Before starting the video, you notice his hand positions on the wheel. A driver without a clue, in over his head.

  • Nodough

    Marshall, what would his hand position be called???Could never correct any problem that way????

  • Marshall Weaver

    He’s doing the double side sway with a twist. Then a thud

  • ArtSpeed

    And what exactly is wrong with his hand position on the wheel? (at least, up until he gets into that corner way too hot…). 9 and 3 is taught at most race schools…

  • Reno Fickler

    Aside from the hand position, under-steer requires tapping the brakes to ‘set’ the car and over-steer means hit the gas to transfer weight rearward

  • This interview should not be attempted by armatures, Another case of “focus on the road” and not your conversation with the camera. Sort of like using your cell phone texting while driving..

Copyright © 2005-2017 RacingJunk.com All Rights Reserved.

Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the RacingJunk.com
Terms of Use, Classifieds Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy