4" stroke 350
#11
We used the small base circle, since it was already on hand. Whether you need to or not will depend on the rods you use, IMO. The motor runs good, it's still in use. It ran mid 10's in a fairly heavy vehicle on motor only.
#12
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Originally Posted by novaman408
I was thinking of enough fill to get me out of any water jacket issues when i start clearancing and figured that i would have to take out some from the pan rail. Is the small base circle cam a necessity? How did it perfom in comparison to some other combos"
Between my friend and i we have (5) 434" motors and (3) with dart blks. and 2 with 400 blks. all have spladed caps and all have small base circle cams and all run on alcohol.
Now the combo i mentioned above 3.875 crank. I have a friend living a few miles away that will only run 350 blks. with 3.875 ultra light cranks an alum rods with light weight pistons. He runs 394's with 2" crank pins and 420Gm pistons on an alcohol toilet bowl, in a shoebox 55 chevy weighing 2650lbs. with driver. It will run 9.20's all day long at 142mph at twin cities,La.
It hurts lots of B/BLK people to hear this but it's a fact. i'm getting ready to put my 434" into my 3250lb Malibu and fully expect it to dip deep into the 9's @ over 140mph, estimating 5.80's or better in the 1/8 mi.
One of the 434" stock blk. motors i mentioned runs 4.80's in a dragsters and has over 200 passes on it.
JMO
Zip.