dropped valve : (

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-18-2007, 10:40 PM
  #11  
slowman
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: mich
Posts: 208
Default

hey ed, i'm not trying to start anything with you about the rpm's. but i have dynoed hundreds if not thuosands of big blocks that dont make power anywere near 7500+ rpm's. i guess i'm a little confused on what your saying. are you saying build all big blocks to rev over this rpm's? are you saying all engines worse rpms are 6600-6900 no matter what cam profile or valve train is in it?
slowman is offline  
Old 05-19-2007, 03:06 AM
  #12  
edvancedengines
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: VA Hospital, Dallas, Tx (214 302 1924) cell-972-464-7400
Posts: 540
Default

hey ed, i'm not trying to start anything with you about the rpm's. but i have dynoed hundreds if not thuosands of big blocks that dont make power anywere near 7500+ rpm's. i guess i'm a little confused on what your saying. are you saying build all big blocks to rev over this rpm's? are you saying all engines worse rpms are 6600-6900 no matter what cam profile or valve train is in it?
Hi,
No problem. I can not understand why you have not seen max horsepower rpm at any higher ranges unless you are dynoing them on Chassi dynos.

No matter what engine we are talking about for drag racing even a Vw Bug engine or a low rpm 430 Lincoln engine the same principles do apply. Rev beyond maximum Horsepower rpm so the rpm into the next gear will not be too far below the torque peak rpm. Inthe older days and actually even now in class racing it is very helpful to reach maximum hp rpm quite a ways before the finish line traps, for ET but for mph you want to reach max hp rpm right in the last beam. So you gear and tire accordingly.

The information about the rpm of most harm for a BB Chevy came from a very good and trusted reliable source that has worked all of his life in researching engine valve train issues and how to avoid them. His name is Noel Manton. Currently he is closely working with more than one NHRA Pro Stock teams, Brad Anderson's operation from time to time as a friend and professionally with one of the top Blown Top Alcohol Teams that is running today. When the 454 was popular in the different sizes and on the way up to the bigger engines he studied them and tested continously to learn how to get more li9fe from them.

Second Source of info about this is David Reher. On the Reher Morrison webpage is a bunch of technical articles that were first published in National Dragster.

Obviously if the engine is not built for it and the components are not designed for it, the higher rpm will not help much and could even hurt. I would think though that in the year of 2007 that everyone racing would at least be as far up to steam as we were back in the early 1970's.

In the early days I had no ability or capability of using any dyno services, most others didn't either. We did however have the capability of seeing how fast and how quick our cars were at the track, just like we all have today. It is by function of trying so many different approaches and different shift rpms that we learned where our cars worked the best.

In todays world, the only engines I have been priviledged to get dynoed were Big Big Blocks. By that I am meaning of 572 cu in to 738 cu in versions. I have not seen one of even those that max horsepowered at below 7,000 rpm. My typical 615 cu in to 646 cu in will max horsepower at 7,400 rpm to 7,600 rpm. This of course does depend on several different variables. With those max hp rpms that is meaning that if run as all motor they would want shift points of 8,000 rpm or higher. I know for a fact that the new not revealed engine of one of the top Pro Mods to be installed toward the end of the year is making hp all the way up to 8,000 rpm and that one is 880 cu in.

Maybe I was over revving my old 460 cu in engine way back in 1984 but it still put down slightly above 1,000 hp way back then. That is not dyno hp. That is hp by calculations of 154 mph in a car weighing with driver 2,980 lbs.

If your BB Chevys are maxing hp at lower than 7,000 rpm, I will be happy to talk with you and hopefully be some help. 972-633-0563.

Ed
edvancedengines is offline  
Old 05-19-2007, 06:36 AM
  #13  
slowman
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: mich
Posts: 208
Default

hey ed, thanks for the response i guess i need to clear some things up. what i'm seeing when customer bring there bbc engines into be dynoed most of them aren't making power over 7500. i have built alot of bbc making power over that but most engine's being built are for the street and guys aren't looking for a high winding bbc. most are looking for 6000rpm big cid pump gas street engines. i agree with you 100% when it comes to all out race engine's and shift points for best et and mph. i have a very close friend at roush that does valve train testing and agrees with you about idle being very hard on valve train but differ greatly when it comes to the the danger zone of 6600-6900. he says that there are way to many veriables to make that claim. if the old big block had 1000hp and it's weight was 2980 with driver the car should have ran 160+mph it only takes 850hp to run 154 in a 2980#car. my mustang with a small block dynoed at 993hp ran 162 at 2950#. i did see that fulton has a 880cid that rev's to 8000rpm but built with very high dollor parts to live in this rpm and out of the price range of 99.9% of most racers.
slowman is offline  
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -