BBC what do you guy thank it will make

Old 03-06-2011, 09:03 AM
  #11  
curtisreed
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
curtisreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: KIEFER, OK.
Posts: 1,312
Default

I say 673hp
curtisreed is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 04:13 PM
  #12  
itsabird
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 816
Default

If you will, post the results. i used almost that same combo to tune my chassis, i used a set of 820 ovals with a back yard port job and 2.25 -188 valves, no idea on the number of ponies, but the thing ran dang good.
itsabird is offline  
Old 03-09-2011, 07:00 PM
  #13  
bixblk
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
bixblk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicagoland area
Posts: 472
Default guess

compression helps, but the heads will hurt this combo 689 HP to 700 and 600 to 625 foot lbs
Let us know good luck , it should be a good stout durable motor
bixblk is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 04:53 AM
  #14  
hammertime
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Coldwater, MI
Posts: 2,998
Default Re: BBC what do you guy thank it will make

Originally Posted by wibberg350
Its a 461 13.8to1 scat rods and crank srp pistons Gm 990s ported 2.30 in take 1.88 ex comp cam .714 in .680 ex 278 in 282 ex at 50 intake is a ported super vic 1050 domanator on e85 2in into 31/2 headers what do you guys thank
720 peak hp and 675 avg
hammertime is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 02:18 PM
  #15  
wibberg350
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lathrop mo
Posts: 18
Default

not sure what head i should have used the motor is in a mud drag truck and they have a stock head casting number rule and it has to be a steel head from what i have read the gm squair port heads were the best. i didnt have them flowed but i did cc the and the intake ports are right at 345 let me know what you thank i can do to get alittle bit more out of her im wanting 750
wibberg350 is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 03:39 PM
  #16  
TheRabbit
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
TheRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Augusta, Ga.
Posts: 2,276
Default

I'm looking at my dyno sheet from my old 548. It made 793 at 6,700. It was similar to your build, but I did have a set of aluminum heads c&c 'd by RFD. They flowed 400cfm at .800 and I did have a vacuum pump.
I doubt with those heads you're gonna get into the 700's, but I'm not fimilar with them. Even though you have to run iron heads can you run a vacuum pump and a dry sump? Not cheap hp, but you gotta do what you gotta do to win!
TheRabbit is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 04:04 PM
  #17  
wibberg350
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lathrop mo
Posts: 18
Default

no vac pump and must have a wet sump
wibberg350 is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 04:47 PM
  #18  
itsabird
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 816
Default

That head may get you close, one of my worries would be the big valve size, 4.280 bore may be a little small for that size valve.
itsabird is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 11:14 AM
  #19  
tcarda
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Big Lake, Minnesota
Posts: 162
Default

I think you will be around 670-680 hp and 570-590 tq, but I think the ported Super Vic is going to hurt you. Thats a big intake for your cu in. A Victor Jr. would be a better choice...IMO.
tcarda is offline  
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -