4.5"Stroke crank in stock 454 block

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-30-2009, 08:45 AM
  #11  
BEAST477
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
BEAST477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,900
Default

You can take a stock block more than .030. I've had two that were .100 over with no problems. You can go as much as .125 over but i would get it sonic tested first. A .100 over with a 4.25 stroke is a 505 a .125 over with a 4.25 stroke is 511. Just some ideas.
BEAST477 is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 09:49 AM
  #12  
itsabird
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 816
Default

Originally Posted by BEAST477
You can take a stock block more than .030. I've had two that were .100 over with no problems. You can go as much as .125 over but i would get it sonic tested first. A .100 over with a 4.25 stroke is a 505 a .125 over with a 4.25 stroke is 511. Just some ideas.
you are right, back in the day, that was what we called a big cube motor.
itsabird is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 02:04 PM
  #13  
blacksleeper
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dead center Wisconsin
Posts: 6
Default

I was trying to think outside the box. If a person wanted to use the stock block,and money and time invested in clearancing weren't an issue, what kind of crazy sh#t could a person accomplish. How about a 4.375" I've always heard only 4.250" also, but I wanted to see if anyone has pushed the envelope.
blacksleeper is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 02:36 PM
  #14  
bjuice
Administrator
RACING JUNKIE
 
bjuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville s.c.
Posts: 3,236
Default

talking about stock appearance Big Cube engines...how about a small block appearance with close to 500ci........

Now if ya got the money and ya wanting to play some mind games..go this route...i will argue with you all day long is a 355ci.... 8)


i ran a .125 454 block with 4.25 stroke..ran like a scalded dog..it was not hardblocked and i had zero Problems..i broke a lifter to end this engines life.

i personally would keep it at .100 over with a 4.25 stroke
__________________
Bjuice..

"I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY ! "
bjuice is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 02:49 PM
  #15  
zipper06
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Default

I personally donot like sleeves in a steel block, either sm/blk or b/blk, they almost always have a head gasket sealing problem. I would rather change blocks than to sleeve one.

JMO

Zip.
zipper06 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:48 AM
  #16  
dparker
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hobbs, NM
Posts: 842
Default

Originally Posted by blacksleeper
I was trying to think outside the box. If a person wanted to use the stock block,and money and time invested in clearancing weren't an issue, what kind of crazy sh#t could a person accomplish. How about a 4.375" I've always heard only 4.250" also, but I wanted to see if anyone has pushed the envelope.
I have a 4.5 stroke in a stock GM block. Made 900 hp on alcohol. There is some grinding invovled but then again your saving 2500.00. I personally think the purchase of a Dart block is money well spent. If you do decide to go with a stock GM block use a tall deck. That way you can use a longer rod. 4.5 stroke 4.375 bore is a 540. My block has no sleeves. I did fill the block with cement though. Ill probably go to a Dart block next year and 4.625 bore. One other small gain to a GM block is I think there about 100lb lighter than a Dart block.
dparker is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 02:46 PM
  #17  
msmisery
Junior Member
JOURNEYMAN
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 28
Default 4.5 crank

Yes you can fit a 4.5 stroke in a stock 454 block . I have done it wit an eagle crank , eaggle h-beam rods and cutom J&E pistons . It was not easy . I had to machine to O.D. of the counter weights off the crankshaft which required a lot of extra work on the balancer and plenty of heavy metal . The pistons have a 1.145 compression height . The end result was a 518 cubic inch BBC for a motorhome . Massive torque output . i am now putting that same engine on an airboat .
msmisery is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 03:14 PM
  #18  
TS1955
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lost Creek, WV
Posts: 533
Default

Just my experience, but I have a 496 (4.310 bore x 4.250 stroke) with aluminum rods and a 511 bbc (4.375 bore x 4.250 stroke) so far no problems with either combo.
TS1955 is offline  
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -