Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: trying to make gun ownership too expensive

  1. #1
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE Swiley383's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    White Bluff TN
    Posts
    600

    trying to make gun ownership too expensive


  2. #2
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    628

    And then there's this . .

    http://12160.info/page/federal-frame...rrest-sheriffs

    Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs

    March 30, 2013
    Ken Jorgustin
    http://modernsurvivalblog.com

    Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or anyone breaking the law).

    The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, executive order, court order, statute or constitutional provision.

    Why are they doing this? Here’s why…


    It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president (Secret Service).

    It would enable the president / executive branch to theoretically override the actions and preventative measures that are now being taken by many States throughout the country who are trying to preserve 2nd Amendment gun rights and who are prohibiting the enforcement of unconstitutional law passed by Congress or pushed by executive order.

    As some of you may know, a growing list of sheriffs (more than 340 so far) across the country have expressed that they will not enforce a Washington mandate that clearly violates the Second Amendment.

    Many State laws to preserve gun rights are gaining momentum. States include Montana, Ohio, Kentucky, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Michigan, Utah, and New Mexico.

    However, in Colorado, Senate Bill SB-13-013 has evidently just passed, and is now ready to be signed by the governor, giving police powers and arrest authority to the federal/executive branch of government (Secret Service) within the State. In Texas a similar bill has just been introduced in the State legislature.

    The president and vice-president Biden have been actively pursuing state legislatures and pushing for passage of the bills. Obama is scheduled to visit Colorado in just a few days. “Colorado is a pawn for the Obama-Biden plan,” and then on to the next… at least those that won’t fall into line.

    It is a full court press by the federal government to empower themselves even further by inserting themselves as police authority within the state, to eliminate opposition.

    …thought you’d like to know


    Note the second comment on the linked article . . good idea . .

  3. #3
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    falkville al
    Posts
    1,766
    there will be war. and it will be on our own shores. i told of this 40 yrs ago. and everyone laughed at me.whos laughing now...not me. im mad.

  4. #4
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE Swiley383's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    White Bluff TN
    Posts
    600
    I'am surprised I have not seen our police cheif on that list. The county high schools gave a skeet and trap team that he coaches and I beleive is one of the people who helped set it up. My nephew is on the team and has been to the state championship both years he has shot on the team hopefully this year will be his 3rd. Small town lawenforcement know they can't cover a rule county quick enough and realize the importance of self defence from bad guys and wild animals.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Copyright © 2005-2016 RacingJunk.com All Rights Reserved.

Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the RacingJunk.com
Terms of Use, Classifieds Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy