A Rating System For The Purpose Of Rating Used Items On RJ
#1
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 661
A Rating System For The Purpose Of Rating Used Items On RJ
Lately I have been wondering how I could best describe the condition of a used part I have listed on RJ.
The are a number of ways.
One method is the use of word association as: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
Another method is numeral association, a rating system from 1 - 10, 10 representing the best or excellent condition.
To me it seems a numeral rating system would best represent the seller.
Anyone have any opinion on this topic..
The are a number of ways.
One method is the use of word association as: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
Another method is numeral association, a rating system from 1 - 10, 10 representing the best or excellent condition.
To me it seems a numeral rating system would best represent the seller.
Anyone have any opinion on this topic..
#2
I would perfer the number system as well. The exellant, fair etc etc leaves to much open as in someone might put excellent when it should be good or fair cuz they mis understood how to rate it
#5
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 661
Originally Posted by DrivingMissDD
Prob is this; one person's 8 might be another's 3. A condition guide for each number as in Hemmings would be ideal.