421 or 427 sbc rotating assembly in a 400 gm passenger block

Old 08-02-2009, 05:07 PM
  #1  
killa79regal
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Default 421 or 427 sbc rotating assembly in a 400 gm passenger block

will it work and wat style main caps will work
killa79regal is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 07:39 PM
  #2  
TheEngineer
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
TheEngineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 129
Default

With both the 3.875" and 4.00" stroke cranks you'll need to clearance the block. Additionally, you'll need a .900" small base-circle cam and have to check the clearance with the rods and cam lobes.

Both cranks are built to work with the 400 main bearing diameters.

Also, the GM 400 blocks will not hold-up as-well-as Dart 400 blocks.

WD
TheEngineer is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 08:03 PM
  #3  
Tod74
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,137
Default

Originally Posted by TheEngineer
With both the 3.875" and 4.00" stroke cranks you'll need to clearance the block. Additionally, you'll need a .900" small base-circle cam and have to check the clearance with the rods and cam lobes.

Both cranks are built to work with the 400 main bearing diameters.

Also, the GM 400 blocks will not hold-up as-well-as Dart 400 blocks.

WD
I dare you to go to the CHEVELLE forum and tell those guys the factory 400 block sucks....
Tod74 is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 08:08 PM
  #4  
DirkaDirka
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
DirkaDirka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,922
Default

That sounds like a challenge.LOL
DirkaDirka is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 09:00 PM
  #5  
Tod74
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,137
Default

Originally Posted by DirkaDirka
That sounds like a challenge.LOL
They blasted me for it.... :lol: for about 4 pages, but that's only because I kept responding.
Tod74 is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 09:49 PM
  #6  
DirkaDirka
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
DirkaDirka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,922
Default

They sound like hardcore guys
DirkaDirka is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 05:26 AM
  #7  
supergass
Member
JUNIOR BUILDER
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 84
Default

That isnt being hardcore, thats just showing there ignorance to a obvious problem! I have seen three here in my circle of friends split in bracket motors. No power adders at all, single carb bracket engines. They split about a inch down from the top of the cylinder. I think they would be fine in a street engine but .060 over is a no-no in any combo.
supergass is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 07:12 AM
  #8  
desoto30
Member
JUNIOR BUILDER
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Childers Australia
Posts: 98
Default

[quote="supergass"]That isnt being hardcore, thats just showing there ignorance to a obvious problem!

Agree, stubborn ignorance & wanting to stay that way obviously.
desoto30 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 10:51 AM
  #9  
Tod74
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,137
Default

Actually it was only a page or two not 4 ...here is the quote that upset two or three people.One of them called it "rude"

Originally Posted by Tod74 View Post
The 400 sb chevy block is a hunk of junk. I have seen several bust . If you were going to spend money on a 400 an aftermarket block should be on top of the list even before good cylinder heads. They are just not very reliable at high power levels...still a great street motor though.
Tod74 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 11:10 AM
  #10  
DirkaDirka
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
DirkaDirka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,922
Default

See I really dont see anything wrong with what you said. You said everything based on facts not opinion. So they should have respected that and possibly let it go or just reply to it with their facts. JMO
DirkaDirka is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -