SBC Rod Length question

Old 04-03-2009, 02:30 AM
  #1  
visualsmoke
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 23
Default SBC Rod Length question

I'm planning a 383. A friend suggests going with a longer rod than the stock 5.7" for some 'free' horse power. My engine will be built for low end torque. What do you think?
visualsmoke is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 03:05 AM
  #2  
TS1955
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lost Creek, WV
Posts: 533
Default

What is the engine being used for? Street use, Drag racing etc. ?

TS1955
TS1955 is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 04:48 AM
  #3  
gimmemud
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ms.
Posts: 191
Default

There is no "free horsepower" in rod length. The rod connects the piston to the crank, simple as that.

Choose a good piston and the crank you want to run, get a rod that connects those 2 togehter and be done.

The only way a longer rod would help is if the piston could be lighter because of the longer rod.
gimmemud is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 08:33 AM
  #4  
slickfuel
Member
CRAFTSMAN
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington state
Posts: 61
Default

actually if he goes with a longer rod the compression hieght
for the pin on the piston would be higher in the bore allowing the
piston to travel deeper into the cylinder allowing for more swept volume
of fuel and air into the cylinder for a bigger detonation of power.

Right ????..... :lol: :lol: rod ratio to stroke..
slickfuel is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 08:45 AM
  #5  
zipper06
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Default

The piston travel would be the same, but there are some minor gains, due the better sealing of the piston rings. The longer rod also puts less side pressure on the piston, which also helps and maybe makes a little more HP, The higher up in the piston creates less piston rock= better sealing of the rings. I don't know what the gains would be but NASCAR typically runs 6.2 rods on a 358" Chevy motor, so there has too be good reasoning for that.

JMO

Zip.
zipper06 is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 09:03 AM
  #6  
ARUSSELL
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 192
Default

The shorter the rod the lower the torque band, If you truely want low end go with a stock 400 rod 5.565
ARUSSELL is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 05:30 PM
  #7  
zipper06
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 2,890
Default

Originally Posted by ARUSSELL
The shorter the rod the lower the torque band, If you truely want low end go with a stock 400 rod 5.565
Hey Mr. Russell

Where you been?, i've been meaning to ask you what do you recomment for piston clearance, on a street driven 406" forged 2618 mat'l piston that will probablly not see more than 7200 RPM. I've got .006 but i think .0045/.005 would have been better. Hopefully i can keep it cool no blk. filler.

Right on, i'm building one right now, 406" flattops, eagle 4340 forged crank, 2618 alum. forged flat tops, 5.565 (h) beams and track 1 heads, 850 DP'er, 1.76 PG with pro brake, for my prostreet 1998 stepside Sonoma, i think about 2800 lbs. I believe i can drive it to sonic and the track and run 10.50's with street slicks.

Zip.
zipper06 is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 09:33 PM
  #8  
jmarksdragster
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
jmarksdragster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 635
Default

If you don't run more than 7000 it will be better with a shorter rod. And for a street motor the factory 5.565 rods are fine with a good set of rod bolts.
jmarksdragster is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 07:07 AM
  #9  
oldandtired
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
oldandtired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sugar Hill, GA
Posts: 1,365
Default

Some technical data for all-

It is essential to use the longest rod you can afford to fit in the engine.
A longer rod causes the piston to "dwell" longer in the vicinity of top dead center. This allows pressure to build higher and translates into more torque and horsepower. Less side load (friction) is a free benefit.
The term usually used is rod ratio.

I can't take credit for this - some Florida guy named Smokey Yunick said this.
oldandtired is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 03:29 PM
  #10  
wmeabates
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 134
Default

If the stroke is the same in two engines the piston is moving slower from TDC to 90 degrees with the longer rod.The piston is moving faster from 90 after to BDC with the longer rod.With most racing cams max. intake lift is 100 deg.-108 ATC.The piston moving faster when the valve is at max.lift is good.Bill.
wmeabates is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -