whats the deal with brodix's advertising?
#1
Member
JUNIOR BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 77
whats the deal with brodix's advertising?
they advertise on paper for having the strongest castings in the business.
down the page they say these heads are not for supercharged applications>
Does that mean that the darts and afr heads are stronger. At least afr advertises thick decks for turbo and supercharger applications. '']]
whats the deal on the brodix. Are they a weaker casting or not?
down the page they say these heads are not for supercharged applications>
Does that mean that the darts and afr heads are stronger. At least afr advertises thick decks for turbo and supercharger applications. '']]
whats the deal on the brodix. Are they a weaker casting or not?
#3
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: san antonio, texas
Posts: 1,233
yea even worse is brodix came out with the "jesse james" edition,
i did not know that mr james was a head guru, or he just wants
heads to make him go fast, with my "jesse james tool box" (the
box is lower to the ground with big rims) and make better welds
with my "jesse james welder", tell me you bought this stuff, and
i'll eat my shoe w/o cooking it 8)
i did not know that mr james was a head guru, or he just wants
heads to make him go fast, with my "jesse james tool box" (the
box is lower to the ground with big rims) and make better welds
with my "jesse james welder", tell me you bought this stuff, and
i'll eat my shoe w/o cooking it 8)
#4
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rutherfordton North Carolina
Posts: 192
Re: whats the deal with brodix's advertising?
Originally Posted by badbug3
they advertise on paper for having the strongest castings in the business.
down the page they say these heads are not for supercharged applications>
Does that mean that the darts and afr heads are stronger. At least afr advertises thick decks for turbo and supercharger applications. '']]
whats the deal on the brodix. Are they a weaker casting or not?
down the page they say these heads are not for supercharged applications>
Does that mean that the darts and afr heads are stronger. At least afr advertises thick decks for turbo and supercharger applications. '']]
whats the deal on the brodix. Are they a weaker casting or not?
#8
Senior Member
EXPERT BUILDER
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 336
hey rabbit that question might be a great question on its own posting!!!
through the years ive seen more people bash brodix heads than others!it seems like their stuff is a lower bang for the buck in compared to the other manufacturers.it seems like afr is pretty high on the list of best product line and their pricing isnt too expensive.
im curious to hear about peoples experiences with canfield,trickflow and holley heads....kinda like to hear about those off the beaten path heads...
through the years ive seen more people bash brodix heads than others!it seems like their stuff is a lower bang for the buck in compared to the other manufacturers.it seems like afr is pretty high on the list of best product line and their pricing isnt too expensive.
im curious to hear about peoples experiences with canfield,trickflow and holley heads....kinda like to hear about those off the beaten path heads...
#10
Senior Member
SENIOR BUILDER
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 101
Originally Posted by badbug3
has anyone here ever compared brodix flow numbers to real flow bench to see just how they compared?
rabbit, .. for an all out 632" I'd use the Dart 11* casting with a custom valve
location. The version I do uses a 2.52" intake valve and flows 575+ @ 1"
and makes 1300+ hp, .. has set records in the UK, and was on the fastest
N/A top dragster at a recent IHRA divisional.
curtis