We will see. Its easy enough to tell. Like I said I may be wrong.
Billy Hall didnt harm anyone but himself. He destroyed his credibility by lying, getting caught, and then masquerading as another user to defend himself. Generally pathetic.
On the other hand the buyer, who was lied to about shipping, received parts not accurately described, and had the hassle of chasing down the pathetic Mr. Hall perhaps came out a bit ahead as he carried himself very well and earned the respect of many of the forum readers.
And Mr. TwoBad1, while you seek to simplify the issue and leverage the RJ name; there are really a couple of legal premises which supercede the term junk, and these are:
A seller is required to represent the item accurately, and
A seller is required to remit item via shipping in a timely manner.
Likewise responsibility to the buyer is to remit payment timely and per agreement.
If its junk, call it junk and ship it when the payment clears and you have no problem. Its when you misrepresent that you create legal issues.
Proliferance of the Internet, and Attorney General's who are more doggedly pursuing scam and ripoff artists will make times more difficult for the bad guys-its already happening. They are catching up.
Scorp