View Single Post
Old 10-27-2007, 06:06 AM
  #10  
Tod74
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,137
Default

Originally Posted by lively
Originally Posted by crossram1969
According to the detectives and the DA's office and a prominent lawyer that was referred to us by Jerry M. the fact that he advertised and sold the car as such is when the fraud is committed. The actual crime of the VIN changes is a whole seperate charge. Each VIN change carries a felony charge. That would be 3 felony charges since all three VIN's were changed. They are both very different crimes. You do not have to prove someone knew about it being fake, just that they advertised and sold it as such. Under the law, he committed fraud. On another note, Tony was very very knowledgable when it came to 1st gen. Z's. He knew all the different part numbers like UH, 9204, 309, 472 etc. You guys that know Z's know what these are. He was not an uneducated person when it came to these cars. I have hours and hours of phone records with this man. He is a swap meet junkie, he knows what he is doing.

Agreed
BUT , it seems to me you did not know what you were doing at all in this transaction!!!!---YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY A ##### MATCHING CAR/ YOU HAVE ALL THIS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THESE ### MATCHING CARS/ AND YOU DO NOT GO CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF OR HAVE AN EXPERT IN THAT AREA DO IT FOR YOU!!!!---YOU ARE AT FAULT 100% IN THIS ONE BECAUSE YOU DID NOT CHECK IT OUT FIRST!!!--A GOOD LAWYER WILL TELL YOU THAT, BECAUSE YOU WOULD LOSE IN COURT----WETHER HE DID KNOW OR NOT YOU ARE THE ONE THAT FUMBLED THE BALL ON THIS DEAL ops: ops: --LIVELY IN ILLINOIS
Tod74 is offline