View Single Post
Old 09-10-2009, 08:45 PM
  #33  
TonyLittell
Member
JUNIOR BUILDER
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by shortcake
yep your right you corrected your post but only because you got called out on it... You knew what the car had all along because we gave you all the papers on the car. As for the email you posted that he sent you where does it say anything you are claiming we said. We had over 10k in the car never did we say in parts for the car. Again come on... you posted an email that doesnt state anything you are claiming we lied about. As for the camaro like I said the car is not what you said it was. It had leaks and miss fires and cost almost $1000. to fix and again as I said the car is going to be dynoed tomarrow (today) the 11th...
No i corrected it after i was made aware what was going on, because i am honest. hell i already had the car sold and still do. guy is paying 800 less for the car because of my mistake of trusting what DAVID HOLLAND said the car had.... so it doesnt hurt me one way or another. I ALREADY HAD IT SOLD AND I TOLD MY BUYER WHAT I FOUND OUT, BECAUSE IT IS THE RITE THING TO DO!!!!

and i said i was still tuning the car both to you guys and in the ad.... true or false?

you have yet to tell anyone what was not on the car that i said ? come on now.... you said i misrepresented the car.... we are all waiting for answers
TonyLittell is offline