Racingjunk Forums

Racingjunk Forums (https://www.racingjunk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Carburetion, Induction, Nitrous (https://www.racingjunk.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Edelbrock 2892 intake (https://www.racingjunk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32401)

TS1955 07-26-2012 12:35 PM

Edelbrock 2892 intake
 
Has anyone used this intake. I've got a Brodix HV1000 on my 434 SBC and was wondering if the Edelbrock would be better. What's everyones opinion. Thanks

TS1955

fast75vega 07-26-2012 01:03 PM

thats the reg vic jr ... not the super vic jr... right? my bro-inlaw has it on his 434 in his vega with world product heads and flat top pistons... like 12to1 comp and 4.30 gear in a ford 9" and ran like 9.40's on alky.

TS1955 07-26-2012 04:33 PM


Originally Posted by fast75vega
thats the reg vic jr ... not the super vic jr... right? my bro-inlaw has it on his 434 in his vega with world product heads and flat top pistons... like 12to1 comp and 4.30 gear in a ford 9" and ran like 9.40's on alky.

No fast...It's a new intake for 2012. A Super Victor II. It has a carb height of 6.75" where my HV1000 is 6.225"

TS1955

fast75vega 07-26-2012 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by TS1955

Originally Posted by fast75vega
thats the reg vic jr ... not the super vic jr... right? my bro-inlaw has it on his 434 in his vega with world product heads and flat top pistons... like 12to1 comp and 4.30 gear in a ford 9" and ran like 9.40's on alky.

No fast...It's a new intake for 2012. A Super Victor II. It has a carb height of 6.75" where my HV1000 is 6.225"

TS1955

so if it sits higher... it should give you more rpm and less torque right? i know the intake runners were the same on the reg vic and the super vic.... just the super vic had the carb that 2' higher. id throw a half inch spacer on the one ya got and try it first......lol

wmeabates 07-27-2012 08:24 AM

There's some talk about that intake and pictures of it on yellow bullet if you did not see it yet.Sounds and looks like a good intake for a big motor. Bill.

TS1955 07-27-2012 08:42 AM


Originally Posted by fast75vega

Originally Posted by TS1955

Originally Posted by fast75vega
thats the reg vic jr ... not the super vic jr... right? my bro-inlaw has it on his 434 in his vega with world product heads and flat top pistons... like 12to1 comp and 4.30 gear in a ford 9" and ran like 9.40's on alky.

No fast...It's a new intake for 2012. A Super Victor II. It has a carb height of 6.75" where my HV1000 is 6.225"

TS1955

so if it sits higher... it should give you more rpm and less torque right? i know the intake runners were the same on the reg vic and the super vic.... just the super vic had the carb that 2' higher. id throw a half inch spacer on the one ya got and try it first......lol

I have a spacer on mine already. I was wondering if the design difference would make more power.

TS1955

fast75vega 07-27-2012 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by TS1955

Originally Posted by fast75vega

Originally Posted by TS1955

Originally Posted by fast75vega
thats the reg vic jr ... not the super vic jr... right? my bro-inlaw has it on his 434 in his vega with world product heads and flat top pistons... like 12to1 comp and 4.30 gear in a ford 9" and ran like 9.40's on alky.

No fast...It's a new intake for 2012. A Super Victor II. It has a carb height of 6.75" where my HV1000 is 6.225"

TS1955

so if it sits higher... it should give you more rpm and less torque right? i know the intake runners were the same on the reg vic and the super vic.... just the super vic had the carb that 2' higher. id throw a half inch spacer on the one ya got and try it first......lol

I have a spacer on mine already. I was wondering if the design difference would make more power.

TS1955

curious if they changed it or just made it taller...i would have to see one.... cause i know the other two were the same except the super vic had a taller spacer but the runners were the same inside.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 AM.