View Full Version : SBC Rod Length question
visualsmoke
04-03-2009, 02:30 AM
I'm planning a 383. A friend suggests going with a longer rod than the stock 5.7" for some 'free' horse power. My engine will be built for low end torque. What do you think?
TS1955
04-03-2009, 03:05 AM
What is the engine being used for? Street use, Drag racing etc. ?
TS1955
gimmemud
04-03-2009, 04:48 AM
There is no "free horsepower" in rod length. The rod connects the piston to the crank, simple as that.
Choose a good piston and the crank you want to run, get a rod that connects those 2 togehter and be done.
The only way a longer rod would help is if the piston could be lighter because of the longer rod.
slickfuel
04-03-2009, 08:33 AM
actually if he goes with a longer rod the compression hieght
for the pin on the piston would be higher in the bore allowing the
piston to travel deeper into the cylinder allowing for more swept volume
of fuel and air into the cylinder for a bigger detonation of power.
Right ????..... :lol: :lol: rod ratio to stroke..
zipper06
04-03-2009, 08:45 AM
The piston travel would be the same, but there are some minor gains, due the better sealing of the piston rings. The longer rod also puts less side pressure on the piston, which also helps and maybe makes a little more HP, The higher up in the piston creates less piston rock= better sealing of the rings. I don't know what the gains would be but NASCAR typically runs 6.2 rods on a 358" Chevy motor, so there has too be good reasoning for that.
JMO
Zip.
ARUSSELL
04-03-2009, 09:03 AM
The shorter the rod the lower the torque band, If you truely want low end go with a stock 400 rod 5.565
zipper06
04-03-2009, 05:30 PM
The shorter the rod the lower the torque band, If you truely want low end go with a stock 400 rod 5.565
Hey Mr. Russell
Where you been?, i've been meaning to ask you what do you recomment for piston clearance, on a street driven 406" forged 2618 mat'l piston that will probablly not see more than 7200 RPM. I've got .006 but i think .0045/.005 would have been better. Hopefully i can keep it cool no blk. filler.
Right on, i'm building one right now, 406" flattops, eagle 4340 forged crank, 2618 alum. forged flat tops, 5.565 (h) beams and track 1 heads, 850 DP'er, 1.76 PG with pro brake, for my prostreet 1998 stepside Sonoma, i think about 2800 lbs. I believe i can drive it to sonic and the track and run 10.50's with street slicks.
Zip.
jmarksdragster
04-03-2009, 09:33 PM
If you don't run more than 7000 it will be better with a shorter rod. And for a street motor the factory 5.565 rods are fine with a good set of rod bolts.
oldandtired
04-14-2009, 07:07 AM
Some technical data for all-
It is essential to use the longest rod you can afford to fit in the engine.
A longer rod causes the piston to "dwell" longer in the vicinity of top dead center. This allows pressure to build higher and translates into more torque and horsepower. Less side load (friction) is a free benefit.
The term usually used is rod ratio.
I can't take credit for this - some Florida guy named Smokey Yunick said this.
wmeabates
04-14-2009, 03:29 PM
If the stroke is the same in two engines the piston is moving slower from TDC to 90 degrees with the longer rod.The piston is moving faster from 90 after to BDC with the longer rod.With most racing cams max. intake lift is 100 deg.-108 ATC.The piston moving faster when the valve is at max.lift is good.Bill.
visualsmoke
07-11-2009, 01:14 PM
Thanks for your insight on my question. Regarding the advantages of the longer rod, is there an RPM range where those advantages come into play the most? Low RPM? High RPM? Or is it an improvement across the board?
littlehotrod
07-21-2009, 03:37 AM
well thanks
littlehotrod
07-21-2009, 03:38 AM
i mean a 383 Stroker Crank Not 282..
greenone60
07-25-2009, 02:02 PM
a 6 inch rod will add about 15 extra hp.
littlehotrod
07-25-2009, 08:42 PM
wow i didnt know it was that much more..i guess u learn something everyday..
OneBadGMC
07-25-2009, 10:11 PM
http://www.stahlheaders.com/Lit_Rod%20Length.htm
mopar1962
07-29-2009, 01:24 PM
I would think the long rod would use a shorter,lighter piston,resulting in a lighter rotating assembly, I would use a lighter rod with the lighter piston weight, I would also check to make sure clearancing is properly done with the longer rods. With the lighter pistons I would lighten the crank a lil bit,I would also use new rods as ya dont know how many cycles are on a used rod. A longer rod will use a lighter piston adding life to the rods. Finally, I would shoot for a 1.80 rod ratio, bad lil engine built on a budget.... voila
ARUSSELL
07-29-2009, 02:31 PM
The shorter the rod the lower the torque band, If you truely want low end go with a stock 400 rod 5.565
Hey Mr. Russell
Where you been?, i've been meaning to ask you what do you recomment for piston clearance, on a street driven 406" forged 2618 mat'l piston that will probablly not see more than 7200 RPM. I've got .006 but i think .0045/.005 would have been better. Hopefully i can keep it cool no blk. filler.
Right on, i'm building one right now, 406" flattops, eagle 4340 forged crank, 2618 alum. forged flat tops, 5.565 (h) beams and track 1 heads, 850 DP'er, 1.76 PG with pro brake, for my prostreet 1998 stepside Sonoma, i think about 2800 lbs. I believe i can drive it to sonic and the track and run 10.50's with street slicks.
Zip.
Im sorry I missed this one, I hope you still need help. I would run is .0050, but .0060 is no problem, just a little noise (but it does not seam like that would bother you)