View Full Version : Heads Help
Grimace
11-18-2007, 08:47 PM
Is it possible to make 325 - 340 HP out of stock 1987 1.94 Intake 1.60 Exhaust heads. They will be sitting on top of a 355 sbc flat top pistons with 4 valve reliefs
they sell them straight from Chevy dealership or jegs,summit etc...making that kind of hp all day long with those heads....but thats about it on what you described as your motor.
a13badazztoys
11-19-2007, 03:46 PM
With enough Nitrous Anything is possible!! :lol:
lookingaround
11-19-2007, 03:51 PM
is that the vortech heads?
Grimace
11-19-2007, 09:40 PM
No they are not vortec heads they are the old style iron heads and i made a mistake typing the first post they are 1.94 1.50
cepx111
11-19-2007, 11:07 PM
Like previous posted, a 200 shot of NOS outta get you there.
If your talking about the later model open chamber heads w/ 1.94 intake valves you'd probably be better off beating a dead horse than wasting any time or money on them, the vortec heads with the smaller combustion chambers and the high velocity ports would suit you much better or you could just save up your money for some better heads all together.
You can score really good set of aluminum heads now for under $1000
Goodluck, Charles
Pwmax
11-20-2007, 05:49 AM
Depends on the cam. A mild bowl blend and 3 angle valve job goes a long way. Are these the Gm swirl port heads? Thats about the era they were from. If so, they are worthless. If its a normal looking port, like a 993, or 186 or something, then that power is achiveable. Just did a 327 resto engine for a 65 Corvette, that was a solid lifter engine, absolutely stick 461 camel backs, with 1.94/1.5 valves, a normal 30-45-60 valve job, and VERY minimal blending under the seat, with a very mild solid cam, he wanted the solid cam, stock rockers, and the only thing added was a Torker 2, because he had it, a new 650 QF vacc carb, and a set of cheap 1 5/8 headers, good machining, balancing, etc, it made 365hp and 385 ft/lbs. THe cam was about quivilent to a mid 220's at .o5o hydraulic, had .465 gross lift, before the lash, so the cam was by no means radical, You can barely hear a lope.
Frank
Advanced Performance
www.get-ap.com
Grimace
11-20-2007, 09:09 AM
the cam is a , Hydraulic Flat Tappet, Advertised Duration 300/300, Lift .515/.515,. The GM crate motor 350/290hp uses a set of old style 1.94 1.50 heads and it makes 290hp. Heres the link
http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/EngineShowcase/tech_specs.jsp?engId=350290&engine=350/290%20HP&sku=12499529
Grimace
11-21-2007, 02:49 PM
Is this because of the way they are ported
chevguy65
11-21-2007, 03:58 PM
I see no problem getting 325-340hp out of a 350 with basically stock heads.
GM has been doing it for many many years.
cepx111
11-22-2007, 03:03 AM
Thing is those are not stock heads they are SMOG heads.
You could swim in the combustion chambers they are so big ( 76 cc ).
With flat tops your compression will at best maybe 8.5 to 1 if that high.
Compression builds power, your gonna want at least 9 to 1 to make any decent power numbers 10.5 to 1 would be better. Look at any muscle car era engine data numbers and the power numbers always went up with the compression.
Not saying you cant make good power with those heads I.E. bowl blending, port matching, cutting for bigger valves, three angle vavle job etc, etc, etc.
But for the money doing the above mentioned to some vortec heads ( 64 cc ) would pay off in much bigger dividends. The compression ratio with vortec's and flat tops will be right 10 to 1 which means you'll have to run 03 octane gas but your Hp number just went up significantly no other change will yeild you more power than that. Most junk yards will pratically give them to you and then take them to the machine and for under a couple hundred bucks you have some very good heads.
But either route your gonna have a decent running 350.
Hell I've seen people take a bone stock 350 slap a four barrel intake, carb and a small flat tappet cam, cram a 411 out back weld up the spider gears, slicks and WAM BAM they have a drag car and have it run like a rapped ape but with a little more investment, time effort you can really have a barn stormer.
Goodluck and Happy Thanksgiving, Charles
Grimace
11-23-2007, 09:33 AM
Does anyone have an idea on how much compression a 58cc head would make on this set up? I just found a great deal on a set and i want to know if it will be worth getting for a street engine. Or will the compression be so high i have to run CAM2?
Pstocknova
11-23-2007, 09:47 AM
it should give you almost 12 to 1.. 11.889 to be exact.. here is a helpful link I have saved pretty cool check it out http://www.race-cars.net/calculators/compression_calculator.html
Scott
Grimace
11-25-2007, 09:35 AM
Thanks Scott! 12 to 1 is to high for a street engine!