Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: A Rating System For The Purpose Of Rating Used Items On RJ

  1. #1
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    664

    A Rating System For The Purpose Of Rating Used Items On RJ

    Lately I have been wondering how I could best describe the condition of a used part I have listed on RJ.
    The are a number of ways.
    One method is the use of word association as: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.

    Another method is numeral association, a rating system from 1 - 10, 10 representing the best or excellent condition.

    To me it seems a numeral rating system would best represent the seller.

    Anyone have any opinion on this topic..

  2. #2
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE DirkaDirka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    1,954
    I would perfer the number system as well. The exellant, fair etc etc leaves to much open as in someone might put excellent when it should be good or fair cuz they mis understood how to rate it
    Its all fun and games till someone loses a nut!

    http://www.racingjunk.com/profile/400466

  3. #3
    Senior Member EXPERT BUILDER
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    379
    That would be great if RJ could come up with something like that a rating on parts and on people. The numerical rating would be best.
    Blowninjected 540 - when is going fast, Fast enough ?????

    http://www.racingjunk.com/profile/182079

  4. #4
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE TheYellaBrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Emmett, Idaho
    Posts
    7,334
    Prob is this; one person's 8 might be another's 3. A condition guide for each number as in Hemmings would be ideal.
    TRUTH is HATE
    to those who
    HATE TRUTH

    God Bless our folks in uniform
    "We the People, have your backs"
    http://www.racingjunk.com/profile/279898

  5. #5
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    664
    Quote Originally Posted by DrivingMissDD
    Prob is this; one person's 8 might be another's 3. A condition guide for each number as in Hemmings would be ideal.
    x2 double D - Thats a Great Idea

  6. #6
    Senior Member RACING JUNKIE
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    4,143
    Quote Originally Posted by DrivingMissDD
    Prob is this; one person's 8 might be another's 3. A condition guide for each number as in Hemmings would be ideal.
    I agree.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Email us - Support@RacingJunk.com
Call us - 866.326.9227
Copyright © 2005-2016 RacingJunk.com All Rights Reserved.

Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the RacingJunk.com
Terms of Use, Classifieds Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy